| Case 25 3/8/99 Cerebrovascular disease |
|---|
| Case discussion This 60 year old male with a history of hypertension for many years, suffered a stroke two years previously that had caused a sudden onset of left sided weakness that had progressed over a few hours. H subsequently recovered well and was left with only moderate residual weakness. Three months previously he developed further weakness of the left side beginning in the leg, progressing to his arm and eventually involving the left side of the face. He recovered slowly and incompletely but was able to walk with a cane upon discharge. On the day of the present admission, the patient arose from a nap, appeared confused and fell to the floor. He was taken to the hospital where he had a seizure on arrival. On admission the blood pressure was 180/105. He was unresponsive to verbal commands and responded to pain by movement of the left arm only. There was increased tone of the left with an extensor plantar reflex. The pupils were equal but miotic. Ophthalmoscopic examination showed no papilledema. Serum glucose was 320 mg/dl. |
Pt is a 60 yo male is brought to the ER following acute onset of confusion and unconsiousness. He was unresponsive to verbal commands showed increased tone and extensor plantar reflex on left. PMH is positive for stroke 2 yrs ago wth residual left sided weakness which worsened 3 months ago. spell out what the stroke was 2 yrs ago and 3 mos ago (eg prior strokes with a left hemiparesis 2 years ago and a new left hemiparesis 3 months previously, now with a new right hemiparesis); also hypertensive, hyperglycemic
Motor: not moving right side
Sensory: pmh does not belong in this section; however you should try to localize the old physical signs eg left hemiparesis; lesion right corticospinal tracts above mid pons if face was invovled. This patients disorder is acute in onset and the time course suggests a vascular or trauma etiology. good Thrombosis of large cerebral vessel for which event? you need to develop a hypothesis for each event!
Alternative Diagnoses:
MRI: pathological changes due to ischemia. good; note seizures at onset suggests embolism Another stroke, brain damage, loss of motor or sensory function, loss of speech, herniation of brain due to increased ICP. good Decreased cerebral blood flow leads to an increase in pH, NO, CO2, O2 and glc extraction. The dendrites and axons are most vulnerable. Lack of ATP leads to failure of the cell pump, allowing K+ to leak out and Na+, Ca2+, and Cl- to leak in. Fluid follows the ions into the cell, resulting in intracellular edema. The cell accumulates glutamate, Ca2+, enzymes and free radicals. Electrical failure, cell necrosis, extracellular edema and hemorrhage ensue. Restoring flow with antithrombic therapy is crucial in returning O2 and energy to the cells as soon as possible. Neurotransmitter antagonists, Ca blockers, NO blockers, proteolysis blockers, prostaglandin blockers, and anti-leukocyte and anti-adhesion treatments aim to reduce cellular damage and necrosis. It is importance to maintainin cerebral perfusion pressure by keeping BP elevated (up to 220/120) and correcting hyperglycemia (a mitochondrial toxin). very good; if you deem the cause to be embolic than anticoagulation to prevent further embolization. |
This 60 y/o male with a history of long-standing hypertension and questionable diabetes presents with progressively altered state of consciousness from confusion to coma, and a seizure. He has a blood pressure of 108/105 mmHg, apparent right sided and left leg paralysis, left sided hypertonia with Babinski sign, bilateral miosis but no papilledema, and serum glucose of 320 mg/dl. In the last 2 years, the patient has had 2 episodes of progressive left sided weakness which has resolved incompletely. good; weakness is worse on the right; left sided weakness may be recent or from prior weakness
The most likely location of the lesion is the base of pons because a
lesion there would disrupt: good Acute, progressive (over a few hours) time course suggests a vascular lesion of either lacunar infarction or intraparenchymal hemorrhage. Because of no papilledema, lacunar infarction is a more likely underlying pathogenesis good; note that the question does not ask you what the likely pathogenesis is on the basis of the physical signs or presentation, rather it asks what is the likely pathogenesis is on the basis of the time course. infarct or hemorrhage are two possibilities (also note hemorrhage does not necessarily have to cause raised icp, for instance if it happens in the pons)
Dx: thrombosis of pontine blood vessels bilaterally
good; the scenario for the likely cause of your principal hypothesis would be basilar artery occlusion CT scan of the head woud help rule out (or rule in) a pontine hemorrhage Serial EEG would help differentiate a seizure disorder from a pontine stroke. Blood pH would decrease and blood ketones would increase in the case of diabetic acidosis. try to stay clear of the expressions rule in or rule out; what you are actually doing is confirming or refuting your principal hypothesis. Expansion of the infarcted area to cause greater damage to the brain Recurrent strokes ok Treatment: Reverse occlusion with thrombolysis therapy Salvage the penumbra (minimize the infarcted area) by: Maintain BP high to maximize collateral flow Prevent systemic hypoxia, acidosis, hyper or hypoglycemia Prevent recurrences by controlling hypertension and diabetes the reason to maintain the high BP is also to maintain the cerebral perfusion pressure (systemic BP - ICP); your answer is scanty on the pathophysiology (note the question is how does understanding the pathophysiology allow you to manage the patient); pathophysiology is covered well in Collins CVA chapter. |